Tuesday, 2 September 2014

How corals stir up their world

Oh man, it's been way too long since I wrote something here...
And this is just a quick article I found, so no extended post. It's about the micro movements that corals make, and that it might give an idea of how coral reefs will react to changing oceans.

Soon! There will be an invasion of jelly fish here, I promise.


Tuesday, 24 June 2014

Plastic Soup: Progress!

In my first post about the plastic soup I posted a link to a TED talk by Boyan Slat. Well, it turns out his project is viable! How awesome is that!

Let's hope they get the money together sooner rather than later and continue this awesome project!





(personal note: great music in this video!)


Have a look at the projects website as well: http://www.theoceancleanup.com/the-concept.html

There's a link for a donation on there, in case you want to support!

Wednesday, 4 June 2014

People of the Coral Triangle

Interesting short documentary about fishing communities in the Coral Triangle. A bit more about cyanide and dynamite fishing, and lots of beautiful images!



Wednesday, 28 May 2014

True Facts: Cuttlefish


Honestly, have a look at any of this man's videos. I introduced him already in the post about the mantis shrimp, but it is worth checking out his other videos as well. Perfect for a 5 minute break from work ;)



Monday, 26 May 2014

SOS Corals



As I said before, there will be more about corals. So here we go. Today's topic is what threatens coral reefs. 

Coral reefs are interesting ecosystems for a lot of reasons. There are entire communities who rely on fish and other organisms found on coral reefs for a living, oceanographers and climate scientists use the health of coral reefs to get an idea of the health of the ocean as a whole, conservation biologists will always be interested in coral reefs because of the incredible range of organisms that live there, and for tourist companies the reefs are a very popular attraction for their customers.

Climate change: acidic, hot oceans
    Coral reefs do not appreciate changes  in the environment very much. Unfortunately for them, in the last decades the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased immensely, causing the oceans to become more acidic and warmer (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2007). Two changes corals find difficult to adapt to. A more acidic environment will weaken the calciferous skeleton that protects the coral which leaves the animal unprotected to predators, and more vulnerable to structural damage caused by storms and waves. You can compare the weakening of their skeleton to getting rid of lime scale by using vinegar to dissolve it...the same happens to the coral. Higher ocean temperatures will cause the zooxanthellae (remember, the little plant in the coral) to die, resulting in the ‘bleaching’ (losing their colours) of corals. Corals have a very limited tolerance to changes in temperature. If sea temperatures rise 1°C above long term averages in an area for a couple of weeks, mass bleaching will begin, leaving the coral reef scary devoid of colour and life (see the picture at the top). There have been many conventions to address climate change, and what should be done to avoid further deterioration of the current situation. The question is though if coral reefs can be saved at all, or if they have suffered too much already to recover from the damage done.

Dynamite fishing: destroyed corals
and dead fish
Not so safe fishing techniques: dynamite and cyanideClimate change is not the only threat to coral reefs. Some communities that depend on fishing for their livelihood, use methods that are devastating to the reefs. And over the past years, the demand for live fish for restaurants and aquarium hobbyists has been steadily increasing. The techniques some use to collect fish are not always in the best interest of the reef and fish, some methods aren't even legal...Can you imagine throwing dynamite on the reef to kill fish so they float to the surface? Quite clearly (I hope) this doesn’t only kill the fish, but also the structure of the reef and other organisms that happen to be in the neighbourhood. Or what about using cyanide to collect live fish for restaurants and aquaria? The cyanide blocks the transport of oxygen in the fish, causing an effect similar to carbon monoxide poisoning, temporarily stunning the fish, so they are easier to collect. Although sometimes the fishermen still have to use hammers to free the stunned fish from the reef. A nasty side effect of cyanide is that not only the fish get affected by the poison...the cyanides slow down the photosynthesis process in the zooxanthellae, causing the algal cells to die, which results in coral bleaching (Jones & Hoegh-Guldberg, 1999).  
Both these techniques are illegal pretty much every where, but it proofs difficult to put it to a complete stop. Local enforcement is not always very strict, and sometimes it is difficult for the local fishermen to think about the positive long term effects, if they can get money for those fish now.

Filtsy humanses
Cyanide fishing: stops photosynthesis in zooxanthellae
And of course, let's not forget another destroyer of coral reefs: the Tourist. Us humans like to see pretty things, and what is more beautiful than the impressive under water view of a coral reef? Or even better: take a piece of the coral home, so you have a memory of that beautiful place for ever. Or buy that nice coral you saw at the souvenir shop down the road. You can guess what is wrong here...if everyone starts taking pieces of coral home, or selling coral in their shop there won't be much left on the reefs. And what will be left is often destroyed beyond recovery. Another problem with diving tourism is that inexperienced divers are not always capable to keep themselves floating above the sea floor/coral reef, so they crash into it, damaging the corals and plants growing there. 
It doesn't have to be all bad news though...well managed, sustainable coral-based tourism can provide an alternative income to the poorer coastal communities, and at the same time will keep the reef protected and healthy. Besides better management of tourism, more marine protected areas are being implemented. Some of these protected areas will not allow any form of tourism, others will allow it only during a certain time of the year, or under very strict rules. 

I think coral tourism is something that we should try to develop into a sustainable business. People will always want to visit coral reefs and the beaches protected by the reefs, so if we find a way to develop sustainable tourism it should be possible to keep the reefs healthy, and at the same time provide the local community with an alternative income to illegal fishing. There you go: a solution for another threat as well!
There are obviously a lot of obstacles to overcome: what boundaries should be set to tourism? On what reefs can we allow tourism without causing too much disturbance? How do we reach the local community, making sure the money reaches them instead of major corporations? What about enforcement of the rules?

Think about those questions. Do you think we can make it a sustainable business? I sure hope so, because other wise we better start getting used to a world without corals...




References
Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Mumby, P.J.; Hooten, A.J.; Steneck, R.S.; Greenfield, P.; Gomez, E.; Harvell, C.D.; Sale, P.F.; Edwards, A.J.; Caldeira, K.; Knowlton, N.; Eakin, C.M.; Iglesias-Prieto, R.; Muthiga, N.; Bradbury, R.H.; Dubi, A. and Hatziolos, M.E. (2007) Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science, 318, 1737-1742.

Jones, R.J. and Hoegh-Guldberg, O. (1999) Effects of cyanide on coral photosynthesis: implications for identifying the cause of coral bleaching and for assessing the environmental effects of cyanide fishing. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 177, 82-91.

Kennedy, D. (2007) Year of the Reef. Science, 318, 1695.


Pictures
http://sites.duke.edu/biology217_01_s2011_pv24/files/2011/04/coral-bleaching_pic.jpg (bleached reef)
http://celebrating200years.noaa.gov/visions/coral/image4_650.jpg (dynamite fishing)
http://www.practicalfishkeeping.co.uk/custom/images/medium/51d14cc83c6f7.jpg (cyanide fishing)

Thursday, 1 May 2014

Close Up: Peacock mantis Shrimp





It looks like a shrimp. Why would I want to write about a shrimp? Well, this is kind of a bad-ass that goes by the name of peacock mantis shrimp. And who doesn't like bad-ass animals?
To set things straight from the start: not a peacock, not a mantis, and also: not a shrimp (closely related though). Guess they should have named it something else maybe.

Some quick facts:
Name: Peacock mantis shrimp (Odontodactylus scyllarus)
Size: 3-18 cm
Distribution: most species live in the Indian and Pacific Ocean between Africa and Hawaii, but the occasional mantis shrimp can be found in colder seas
Habitat: under rocks, burrowed in a hole waiting for their prey to come close
Food: clams, small fish, small invertebrates

What makes this creature more bad ass than, let's say, your average brown shrimp? Obviously the colours are more appealing (peacock part of the name explained). But that's not it.
First of all, they have incredible eyes that can move separately from each other. Each eye has 3 focal points, which means it can see depth with 1 eye where we need both our eyes to do that. And that's not all...they have 16 photo-receptors (light receptors). We have 3: blue, red and green. It is impossible to imagine what a mantis shrimp can see! They perceive UV and infra-red light, they can see polarised light (we can't), and they can see colours we don't even know exist. Pretty cool if you ask me.

Second of all. These creatures can throw a serious punch.
Under its body it has a club-like appendage that it uses to strike at prey (or enemies). It kind of looks like the legs from a praying mantis (explains mantis part of the name). And it's fast! About 50 times faster than the blink of a human eye. Can you imagine that? It strikes with such a force that it can break shells, and even thick glass. Yeah, don't put your finger near one, it hurts! 



And because it's informative and funny: True facts about the mantis shrimp:

Check out the other videos on YouTube by this guy. He's funny!




links used:
http://www.aqua.org/explore/animals/mantis-shrimp
https://img2.blogblog.com/img/video_object.png
http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4135381/Peacock+Mantis+Shrimp
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjBM_ZpVW3LtmeIEP_ABHRW5fCEZGMWXmt1DVnX55TUKLPeMSNPdh99acaeqmjoEnJtkCO2ABR1omQotshI697O6m0dKC4I21UDK4GGcyT6vQz8pzx_erkDXG9xZPAiNnCZNP9Kai0PtS19/s400/Mantis-shrimp.jpg
http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/arthropoda/crustacea/malacostraca/eumalacostraca/royslist/species.php?name=o_scyllarus
http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2014/01/23/the-mantis-shrimp-sees-like-a-satellite/

Thursday, 10 April 2014

Desert in the ocean?




I've talked about coral reefs being the rainforest of the ocean, an oasis so to speak. That raised a question: Is there such a thing as a desert in the ocean? A place where you won't find a great abundance of life?
And the answer is: yes, such places exist. They are known as dead zones. Sounds dangerous. A dead zone is an area in the ocean that is oxygen-starved (Editors of e, 2008) and they are therefore also called hypoxic zones (hypo = under, oxic = with oxygen). If oxygen levels in an area drop below 2 mg/l, it qualifies as a hypoxic zone (Rabalais et al., 2002). 
Dead zones occur naturally in deeper parts of the eastern Pacific Ocean, in the Arabian Sea, and off West Africa (Levin et al., 2001), and some of these parts are permanently hypoxic or anoxic (no oxygen at all). In deep water dead zones there is not as much diversity of species compared to deep oxygenated waters. You need a very specific set of traits to be able to survive in oxygen depleted zones. But then again...the animals that are able to live there tend to show up in massive amounts, so there are still a lot of creatures to be seen down there (mainly worms, crabs, star fish, some shellfish) (Levin et al., 2001).

And then there are the dead zones that occur in shallow, coastal waters. The biggest ones are found in the Gulf of Mexico, the Black Sea and the East China Sea. The dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico is being studied the most, and a lot of the numbers I've used here come from research in that area.
The number of coastal areas where hypoxia occurs is increasing and seems to be driven by human activities (Rabalais et al., 2002). Hypoxia in shallow waters is caused by an overload of nutrients in the water, mainly nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus. These nutrients come from fertilizers used for agriculture, effluents of sewage systems, emissions of factories and cars, and they get flushed into river systems, eventually ending up in the ocean.

What happens next? There are 2 things required for hypoxia to occur (Rabalais et al., 2002). First of all, the water column must have different layers of water (stratified), so that the bottom layer is separate from the top layer. These layers are formed by differences in water temperature and salinity; cooler, saltier water = heavier, and forms bottom layer. If these layers have formed there is no (or little) transport of oxygen from one layer to the other. The second factor is the breakdown of organic material. The high amount of nutrients in the water causes a massive increase in phytoplankton (tiny microscopic plant like organisms), which results in more organic matter reaching the bottom sediments. There, the organic matter will be broken down by bacteria using oxygen (aerobic bacteria), leaving the water above the sediment depleted of oxygen. Decomposition of the organic matter also leads to a growth in microbial organisms, increasing the amount of oxygen needed to support the organisms (Diaz & Rosenberg, 2008). And this happens in an environment where oxygen is already scarce...

These steps are the first phase of hypoxia. In the second phase, the oxygen levels keep dropping, causing the mass mortality of benthic (on/in the bottom living) animals. These are mainly fish, crabs and oysters that need about 3 mg/l oxygen. Worms and clams in the sand only need oxygen concentrations of 1 mg/l, so they are still okay with living in most dead zones. Sometimes, even animals that can swim away won't make it. And then you might see horrible death scenes of thousands of dead bodies washed upon the beach, or floating at the surface. It's not a pretty sight, and I can only imagine the smell that must come with so many dead fish...
The third phase is characterized by hypoxia becoming a seasonal event. Very often hypoxia occurs in summer, when the temperatures are higher and there is explosive growth of phytoplankton (increasing the amount of organic matter, which leads to more decomposition...etc. phase 1 all over again). If the hypoxia sustains for years, the fourth phase can be entered where the dead zone can expand and the amount of oxygen will decrease even more, leading to an anoxic (without any oxygen) area (Diaz & Rosenberg, 2008). 




All these changes, deaths, and animals leaving the scene to find a better place to live, will eventually cause a change in the ecosystem structure and functioning. And that in turn will affect the way we can use these ecosystems. A lot of the dead zones we know are important economical fishing grounds. So if the animals disappear from there, or are in a bad condition because of the water quality, that for sure will affect fisheries, resulting in less fish (or bad fish) on your plate.

I always like to finish on a note of 'think about what you're doing'. This is a big problem. We can't solve it over night, but maybe just stop and think about it for a second when you fertilize you garden, or step in your car (for a 5 minutre drive to the supermarket?), or flush something chemical down the drain. Think about where it ends up, and what it does to the oceans.

I know this was kind of a tough post, oxygen levels aren't the most exciting thing to write about...but I definitely learned new stuff writing this, and I can only hope I got the information across without boring you to death!




References:
Chesapeake Bay Program (2012) Dissolved oxygen. Retrieved from: http://www.chesapeakebay.net/discover/bayecosystem/dissolvedoxygen

Diaz, R.J. and Rosenberg, R. (2008) Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science, 321, 926-929

Editors of e - The Environmental Magazine (2008) Deserts in the ocean. Retrieved from: http://www.popsci.com/editors-e-environmental-magazine/article/2008-10/deserts-ocean.

Levin, L.A., Etter, R.J., Rex, M.A., Gooday, A.J., Smith, C.R., Pineda, J., Stuart, C.T., Hessler, R.R. and Pawson, D. (2001) Environmental influences on regional deep-sea species diversity. Annual review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 32, 51-93.

Rabalais, N.N., Turner, R.E. and Wiseman Jr, W.J. (2002) Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, a.k.a."The Dead Zone". Annual review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 33, 235-263.

Links:
Top picture: http://www.my-walls.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/fish-underwater-desert-balloon-desert-fish-lifebuoy.jpg
Map: https://nofishleft.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/coastal-dead-zones.jpg
Third picture: http://ian.umces.edu/ecocheck/forecast/chesapeake-bay/2010/methods/#_DO_-_anoxia
Dead starfish: http://www.csgc.ucsd.edu/NEWSROOM/NEWSRELEASES/2012/documents/Sonomaalgalbloom.htm

Thursday, 27 March 2014

Corals 101




I don’t know a single person that does not like the looks of a coral reef. Personally, I love them. In university, I wrote my Bachelor thesis on coral reef ecology, even though I had never seen a coral with my own eyes...but last September that changed when I was on Zanzibar! I made 2 dives there, and finally got to see a lot of real life corals. It was awesome.
There is so much to say about corals that I am going to split it up in several posts. For today we’re gonna stick with the basics. What is a coral? What does it look like? What does it eat? What kind of corals are there? Where do you find them?

What a coral looks like on the inside

A coral is an animal (you have no idea how long I lived with the idea that they are plants!) that consists of a polyp (basically a sac-shaped animal) that is housed in a hard external shell to protect the polyp (Pinet, 2009). The polyp has an opening at the top, that functions as his mouth as well as his anus. I know. Gross. I’m glad we got rid of that system somewhere along the evolutionary line. 
Around this opening you find tentacles (like in anemones) with special cells that sting (nematocysts), and cells that produce a slimy substance to trap prey. Corals are fixed to the ground, so they cannot actively chase their prey. Instead, they have to wait for tiny bits of plankton to drift into their tentacles. Not the most efficient way of feeding you’d think, but apparently it works, because corals have been around for about 200 million years!

Plankton!
Plankton?














There are two kinds of corals: corals that have a pact with tiny plant cells, and live in tropical seas (hermatypes) and corals that do not have these tiny plant cells, and can live in deeper, cooler waters (ahermatypes).

The corals of the former class are the types that build the impressive reefs we like to see so much. If you put one of these corals under a microscope, you will find plants of just 1 cell big (zooxanthellae) that live in the outer layer of the coral’s flesh. What is this pact they made? For the plant cells, living inside the coral gives them a safe and stable environment, and they get their food from the waste that the coral produces. In return, the plant cell does its magical photosynthesis thing (making oxygen), providing the coral tissue with oxygen, and when it uses the waste products of the coral, it protects the coral from potential toxic products. And very generous of the little plant: if there is not enough food for the polyp, it can digest the plant cells that live inside it (Pinet, 2009). 
Because the zooxanthellae need sunlight for photosynthesis, these corals can only be found in shallow, warm waters. The optimal water temperature for a hermatypic coral is 20°C (Pinet, 2009). Another environmental aspect that controls how well corals grow, is the turbidity of the water. If the water is very muddy, all those little particles block the sunlight, and that means that the plant cells cannot produce enough oxygen for the coral.

Where to go to find corals

The corals of the second class do not have plant cells living in their tissue, so for their food they are completely dependent on whatever swims/floats into their tentacles. Lucky for them, they are not restricted to the nutrient poor, warm, shallow waters of the tropics. Cold water corals are not dependent on penetrating sunlight for their zooxanthellae, and they can grow in temperature ranges as low as 4° to 12°C (Murray Roberts et al., 2006). These temperatures are mainly found in the shallow waters of higher latitudes, and in the deep open ocean. In these colder waters, there is much more plankton available for the corals to feed on, so even without zooxanthellae to help them out, cold-water corals are still perfectly capable to feed themselves.

In general, coral reefs are very species rich environments (Snelgrove, 2010) compared to other parts of the ocean. This is because coral reefs can become very complex structures, with many holes and corners for animals to hide in. A very attractive feature for most animals, because living in the open sea isn't exactly what you call safe...So a lot of small and large fish and invertebrates find their shelter on a coral reef, creating an ecosystem that is so diverse it gets called 'rainforest of the ocean'. I like that. In my head I immediately create this image of huge trees under water, and all the fish swimming between the branches. 
Unfortunately, just like the real rainforests, the underwater versions are not doing so well...A lot of the reefs around the world are dying, and more than two thirds of coral reefs are in a bad condition. I really hope we can stop it from getting worse, because what would we do without them?!

Rainforest of the ocean


References:

Murray Roberts, J.; Wheeler, A.J. and Freiwald, A. (2006) Reefs of the deep: the biology and geology  of  cold-water coral ecosystems. Science, 312, 543-547.

Pinet, P.R. (2009) Invitation to Oceanography (5th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

Snelgrove, P.V.R. (2009) Discoveries of the Census of Marine life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Pictures:
Top: http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/wiredscience/2012/12/coral_reef.jpg
Polyp: https://www.e-education.psu.edu/earth103/files/earth103/module07/polyp_with_zooxanthellae.jpg
Polyp 2: https://genefish.wikispaces.com/file/view/coral_polyp.jpg/107854669/coral_polyp.jpg
Plankton: http://australianmuseum.net.au/Uploads/Images/7566/e004_big.jpg
Map: http://www.grida.no/images/series/rr-in-dead-water/Figure07.jpg
Coral reef: http://www.annefontainefoundation.org/sites/annefontaine-pny.cmsloungesvn.com/files/Great-Barrier-Reef-Holiday-Reef-Fish12.jpeg



Friday, 14 March 2014

The Pacific Garbage Patch





You may have heard about it…the giant patch of plastic in the Pacific Ocean. 
I first got to know about this through a guest-lecture at my university in Wageningen (in the Netherlands). To be honest I don’t remember much of what he talked about, it was 6 or 7 years ago, but it did make an impression. He showed pictures of birds (dead) with their stomachs full of plastic bits, giant patches of plastic bottles floating about in the ocean, pretty shocking stuff for a biologist (or anyone else I guess). 

So, what’s up with this plastic garbage patch? 
The garbage patch I am talking about here, is located in the Pacific Ocean. Or actually, there are two garbage patches. One is located east of Japan (the Eastern Garbage Patch), and the other one is located just north of Hawaii (the Western Garbage Patch).  Each patch is double the size of the state Texas, and is about 10 metres deep. The Pacific Ocean might be big, but this is more plastic than it can handle! 

How does all this plastic end up in these specific places, you’re thinking? 
A bit of basic oceanography. In all the oceans you will find currents. There are big currents that connect all the oceans together, and from these big currents spring smaller currents within each ocean. These currents are called gyres, and they are caused by differences in pressure, temperature and salinity of the water, and the wind. When the wind makes contact with the ocean surface, the water is set in motion. If the wind persists for long enough, this motion descends through the water column, causing a spiralling current (called the Ekman spiral) (Pinet, P.R., 2009). And it is these Ekman spirals and gyres that cause the plastic to collect in these garbage patches. See the yellow dots in the map? That’s plastic. Now the plastic starts moving, following the white arrows on the right and the blue ones on the left, and the Ekman currents and winds keep it all in place (click the map to go to the website for an animated version). 


Plastic is an anthropogenic (man-made) kind of garbage. It is estimated that 80% of plastic in the oceans comes from sources on land, and the other 20% come from activities on sea, such as fisheries, cruises, and shipping (Lebreton et al, 2012). The debris consists of pretty much anything plastic you can think of. Bottlecaps, toothbrushes, floating fishnets, bottles, and tiny bits of plastic (Hoshaw, L. 2009). Just try to think of how much plastic you deal with every day…your food is wrapped in it (lots of it for some reason), your computer has plastic in it, your phone, cars. And plastics are not easily biodegradable, which is why all that plastic is floating there in the Pacific Ocean, and why the patches keep growing. 
When we have a closer look at what plastics the patch consists of, there are the macro-plastics (the bottles, toothbrushes, bottlecaps etc) and the micro-plastics (tiny particles of plastic). What we see in all the pictures are mainly the macro-plastics. The birds with their stomachs full of plastic bits, a turtle with a plastic ring around its shell, littered beaches full of plastic. 

Photo by Chris Jordan
But it's the micro-plastics that are the major constituent of the garbage soup. And despite them being so small, they are dangerous! Because of their size the particles are mistaken for food by marine organisms, and they get ingested by the animals. The composition of the particles makes it easy for pollutants in the water to attach onto these mini-plastics (Cole et al, 2011). This is chemics, and I am not good at that, so I am going to take the scientists word for it here...A lot of the pollutants are toxic for animals (and humans), so by ingesting the plastic bits, fish, dolphins, and us humans, accumulate the toxins in their bodies, which is obviously not a very healthy business to be doing. 

Why does this garbage patch get so little attention? First of all, until not too long ago we were simply not aware of its existence. The Pacific Ocean is immense. Until captain Charles Moore came across it with his crew in 1997. 'It seemed unbelievable, but I never found a clear spot. In the week it took to cross the subtropical high, no matter what time of day I looked, plastic debris was floating everywhere.' (Moore, 2003). Secondly, because it's so far away. If a problem is not directly on your doorstep, it is quite easy to think: this is not my concern. But it is! Since the discovery, efforts to raise awareness have increased. But still, you don't hear much about it, until you start looking for information. The problem certainly has not become any less since captain Moore discovered it...we keep producing more plastic every day, and it won't break down or disappear by itself. 

So is there anything we can do? Fishing out all the macro-plastics seems like an idea...but men, that would take ages! What would you do with all the plastic? And who would pay for it? Even if all this works, there is still the issue of the micro-plastics. Much more difficult to target...then I remembered a Tedx Talks video that appeared on my facebook feed a while back. I am impressed! This guy (he is quite young) has some really interesting ideas. It's still a project of massive proportions, but he makes it sound like there might be a solution. We're not there yet. His concept is promising, but they are still studying the feasibility of it. I hope it works, and that there will be enough investors to make it happen once he gets to that point. 

In the mean time: put your garbage in the bin. Just like that, we already help.



References:

Hoshaw, L. (2009, November 10). Afloat in the ocean, expanding islands of trash. New York Times

Lebreton, L.C.-M., Greer, S.D., and Borrero, J.C. (2012) Numerical modelling of floating debris in the world’s oceans. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 64, 653-661.

Moore, C. (2003) http://www.fvrd.bc.ca/InsidetheFVRD/MeetingsAgendasMinutes/AirQualityandEnvironmentManagement/Archived%20Agendas/2010%2003%2002%20Environment%20Committee/item%206.2%20-3%20Email%20re%20Recycling.pdf

Pinet, P.R. (2009) Invitation to Oceanography (5th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

Other websites:
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/oceans/pollution/trash-vortex/ 
http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/about/media/where-are-pacific-garbage-patches.html





Thursday, 13 March 2014

Let me introduce to you all...me!

I am new to this. I am going to be honest about that. 
Start at the beginning? 
I have a Master degree in Applied Aquatic Biology from the University of Portsmouth (UK). 
My passion for the sea and everything that lives in it, is old. As a child, I was all about dolphins. My first school project talk was about dolphins, my walls were covered with dolphins, I had a dolphin watch. I remember my dream job was to be a dolphin trainer. So not to the surprise of many, I chose to study biology and focus on everything marine. But to the surprise of many, I did not study dolphins, or any marine mammal for that matter. It's the fish that got my full attention. Small, big, dangerous, poisonous, weird looking, colourful, name it and I can pretty much guarantee you I like it!
For my final research project, I studied the behaviour of the blue cod (Parapercis colias) amongst each other. So, what happens when there is food present? Will they fight? Are the big ones in charge? Is size important at all? I spent hours (probably more close to days or weeks) watching under water videos of blue cod around a food source, looking for patterns in their behaviour. The crazy thing? I didn't even get bored...I think I surprised myself and my supervisor with that. Right now, we're still writing everything up to be published (still can't believe there will be a paper with my name on it! Big thing for scientists-to-be).

Why this blog? Because I think knowledge should be spread. And most scientific studies aren't that easy to understand. So with this blog, I want to try and make science a bit more fun for everyone. Sometimes I'll discuss interesting papers, explaining them in 'normal people' language, other times I'll just write a post about a species that caught my interest, or something marine related that was in the news, or whatever I can come up with.
I am not the best writer in the world, I know this. I've been told I write the same way as I tell a story, so if you like story-telling, you might enjoy my writing style! My goal isn't to become a writer, I write because I want people to get excited about fish, dolphins, whales, and everything else in the oceans. I want people to know more about these things.

I hope you will enjoy my blog!

The fish of my project: blue cod (photo is taken by my supervisor)